
Photos by Samantha Christian An investigation into the Oregon Police Department claims that chief Doug Pettit directed his staff to remove incident reports at the Union Sports Club from the police log to prevent village officials and the public from knowing the number of police calls. The reports were held for a month and later placed back in the police log after Observer reporters had checked them, according to a statement released last Thursday.

Pettit began working for the Oregon Police Department in December 1975.

Pettit
In a report released last week, village officials charged that recently retired police chief Doug Pettit violated village and police department policies and “betrayed” their trust in his dealings with the Union Sports Club.
The report called Pettit’s actions “reprehensible.”
The 1,900-word report is the result of an internal investigation conducted by attorney Warren Kraft, who specializes in municipal labor relations. The Village Board hired Kraft in April after officials learned that the Wisconsin Department of Justice was conducting its own investigation of Pettit, who was until this month the longest-tenured police chief in the state.
The investigation involved interviewing police department personnel, village officials and village residents, and “entailed reviewing thousands of documents and email communications,” the report says.
Kraft did not interview Pettit, however, who refused an offer to speak with the investigator. Pettit did not return the Observer’s phone calls after the report was released.
But in an Aug. 18 interview, Pettit dismissed the investigation as “one-sided” and speculative.
The Village Board’s report alleges that beginning sometime in 2006, Pettit and other Oregon police officers used village resources, including uniforms, squad cars and other equipment, while working off-duty at the Union Sports Club on Braun Road.
The report says Pettit accepted payments from the club in cash or personal check. He in turn paid officers in cash, the report says, without documentation.
The report indicates that some police officers decided not to return to the club after working there once or twice, while others continued to work off-duty.
Juan Serate, the club’s former manager, told the Observer in June that officers had worked off-duty at the club until December 2013. The board voted in June not to renew the club’s liquor license.
The report also claims that Pettit directed his staff to remove incident reports at the club from the police log to prevent village officials and the public from knowing the number of police calls. The reports were held for a month and later placed back in the police log after Observer reporters had checked them, according to the statement released last Thursday.
Village officials had been discussing Oregon Police Department personnel in closed sessions since late last year but didn’t hire their own investigator until they’d learned of the DOJ probe in April.
That investigation focuses on Pettit’s actions “that may rise to the level of misconduct in public office,” the board’s statement says.
“While the Department of Justice investigation focuses on Chief Pettit, the allegations raised collateral issues regarding conduct by individual employees in the Police Department that needed to be addressed by the Village Board,” the statement says. “As a result, the scope of the Village Board’s investigation was much broader and focused primarily on Chief Pettit’s alleged conduct and secondarily on collateral issues involving individual department employees.”
Pettit began working for the Oregon Police Department in December 1975 and retired effective Monday, Sept. 1. Prior to retiring, Pettit was the longest tenured police chief in the state, having served almost 29 years.
The Village Board voted in April to increase Pettit’s annual salary to $96,000 after he complained about his income relative to other police chiefs in comparable communities.
He went on personal and medical leave in May, and his retirement package includes some health benefits that had been converted from unaccrued sick leave.
The village hired Dale Burke to serve as interim police chief in June.
‘Conflict of interest’
In an interview with the Observer last week, Village President Steve Staton said he and other officials became aware last year that officers were working off-duty at the Union Sports Club “wearing village uniforms and using village equipment, cars and so forth.”
“I knew our officers were working there, but I thought they were on-duty,” Staton said.
Looking into the matter “kind of got the ball rolling, and one thing led to another” in uncovering the extent of the former chief’s alleged misconduct, he said.
Staton said information contained in the village’s report is the result of Kraft’s investigation. The DOJ’s investigation is ongoing.
“What we have in this report is based on extensive investigation – interviews, review of electronic records – and they’re facts,” Staton said.
“This went wrong the way that it did because people like myself and Mike Gracz (village administrator) and the trustees – we trusted Doug Pettit,” Staton added. “We had confidence that he did things right, and he didn’t. He betrayed us. He violated our trust.”
Along with accepting cash payments for off-duty work while using village equipment and resources, Pettit is alleged to have conducted an alcohol compliance check at the Union Sports Club before directing a subordinate to sign a compliance-check document instead of signing himself.
“With regard to the cash payments and compliance checks, in my opinion, that was a clear conflict of interest of how Chief Pettit conducted himself,” Staton said. “The facts speak for themselves.”
The report also says Pettit directed two Village of Oregon police officers to travel out of the department’s jurisdiction and meet with a person who owed money for off-duty work performed by the chief and other officers.
Withheld information
Staton seemed particularly bothered about Pettit not providing information to the Village Board.
The report said Pettit also failed to inform village officials of the number of annual police calls to Union Sports Club or that the club had been “raided” by the Department of Revenue in 2012.
“Things were happening at the sports club that he pulled out of the record to keep secret,” he charged.
In Staton’s tenure as Village President, he has led the Village Board in rewriting the village’s ordinance governing alcohol licenses and sales.
“Doug Pettit was heavily involved in helping us rewrite our liquor license ordinance and applications,” he noted. “He knew it was important to me and the board to stay on top of this.
“When we’d do (liquor) license renewals, I would always ask the chief if there are any businesses we should be concerned about. And he would say no, we checked them all and they’re fine. Well that was wrong, because the Union Sports Club had 344 incidents.”
Pettit defended himself in a June interview with the Observer.
He said there was “no defined procedure in terms of reviewing the liquor license – what we provided the Village Board every June when they’re reviewing liquor licenses for any facility.”
Pettit acknowledged that the liquor license policy requires a review of all license holders “to make the board aware of any concerns or problems that exist.” He said he didn’t mention the sports club’s history because the number of incidents reported to police didn’t seem excessive.
The club’s dances were often attended by 300 or 400 people.
“I’m just stating that I didn’t think that was excessive and others do,” he said. “This is based on my experience and what I’ve seen in other operations that hold large numbers of people.”
Pettit said it was “disappointing that someone would insinuate that I would intentionally not report something to the Village Board for any sort of personal gain.”
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” he said in the June interview. “I’ve been a police chief in this community for 29 years, and I’ve always put the community’s interest before mine or before the police department’s, for that matter, and that’s the way I’ve always policed this community.”
Pettit also said he didn’t know about the DOJ’s 2012 raid on the club.
Staton disputed the denial, saying the chief knew shortly after the raid occurred and should have informed village officials.
“We should have been told about what was happening at the Union Sports Club,” he said.
Staton pointed out that not every police officer agreed with the way that Pettit conducted police department oversight at the club.
“I can tell you that some officers stopped working there because they felt things were not running the way they should be with regard to what the police were doing, so they quit going,” he said. “They wouldn’t sign up.”
Adding oversight
Staton said that in light of what’s happened, the Village Board intends to have better oversight of the Police Department and its chief going forward.
“We’ll be getting monthly reports from Chief Burke on matters of significance and also having more conversations with him,” Staton explained.
However, he added, it still comes down to trust.
“No matter what you set up for reporting, it doesn’t work if the person in charge doesn’t tell you,” he said. “We can’t micromanage all village departments. There’s not enough time, so you have to have people you can trust that they’re going to do things right.”
Staton said the Village Board decided not to bring a case against Pettit before the Police Commission because he no longer works for the village, and “it would have been extremely costly.”
The Observer requested information on how much money the village spent on attorneys’ fees since beginning the investigation, but did not receive a response by press time.